Thread: Megaupload shut down by the US Government

Feds Shutter Megaupload, Arrest Executives | Threat Level | Wired.com

Megaupload, the popular file-sharing site, was shuttered Thursday and its executives indicted by the Justice Department in what the authorities said was “among the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought by the United States.”

Seven individuals connected to the Hong Kong-based site were indicted on a variety of charges, including criminal copyright infringement and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Four of the members of what the authorities called a five-year “racketeering conspiracy” were arrested Thursday in Auckland, New Zealand, the authorities said.

One of those arrested was Kim Schmitz, aka Kim Dotcom, Megaupload’s founder. His attorney, Ira Rothken of California, said neither he nor his 37-year-old client, who resides in Hong Kong and New Zealand, was given the opportunity to surrender. Schmitz was arrested without notice, he said.

“We’re looking into what’s going on,” Rothken said in a telephone interview.

Visitors to the Megaupload site, which gets about 50 million hits daily and claims 4 percent of all internet traffic, were greeted with a message from the Justice Department. ”This domain name associated with the website Megaupload.com has been seized pursuant to an order issued by a U.S. District Court.”

Swizz Baetz, Megaupload’s chief executive, was not implicated in the indictment but is embroiled in a legal spat with Universal Music over a Megaupload promotional video.

The government said the site facilitated copyright infringement of movies “often before their theatrical release, music, television programs, electronic books, and business and entertainment software on a massive scale.” The government said Megaupload’s “estimated harm” to copyright holders was “well in excess of $500 million.”

Unsealed Thursday, the five-count indictment from the Eastern District of Virginia came as the Justice Department said it seized 18 domains in all connected to Megaupload. The agency said it executed more than 20 search warrants in the United States and eight countries, seizing $50 million in assets.

Megaupload, which often charges its 150 million registered members for its file-sharing service, was on the recording and movie industries’ most-hated lists, often being accusing of facilitating wanton infringement of their members’ copyrights. The indictment claims it induced users to upload copyrighted works for others to download, and that it often failed to comply with removal notices from rights holders under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, yet the site routinely removes uploaded child pornography.

The money laundering charges are connected to allegations Megaupload paid users for uploading infringing content under an “uploader rewards” program.


Others indicted include:

*Finn Batato, 38, a citizen and resident of Germany, chief marketing officer.
*Julius Bencko, 35, a citizen and resident of Slovakia, graphic designer.
*Sven Echternach, 39, a citizen and resident of Germany, head of business development.
*Mathias Ortmann, 40, a citizen of Germany and resident of both Germany and Hong Kong, chief technical officer co-founder and director.
*Andrus Nomm, 32, a citizen of Estonia and resident of both Turkey and Estonia, software programmer.
*Bram van der Kolk, aka Bramos, 29, a Dutch citizen and resident of both the Netherlands and New Zealand, programmer.

The indictment alleges that Dotcom owns 68 percent of Megaupload.com, Megaclick.com, and Megapix.com, and 100 percent of the registered companies behind Megavideo.com, Megaporn.com and Megapay.com. The feds allege that in 2010 alone, Dotcom personally made more than $42 million.

The feds also say that over the last five years, PayPal has transferred more than $110 million in payments from users buying premium accounts that grant access to copyrighted works from “computer servers located around the world.” Non-premium customers could watch no more than 72 minutes of a video at a time, according to the indictment.

The feds also added that a number of those arrested, including Dotcom, uploaded and downloaded infringing material to Megaupload.

According to the indictment, the defendants generated revenue through subscriptions and online advertising. Subscriptions cost as “little as a few dollars a day” or $260 per lifetime. The indictment claimed the site took in $150 million in subscription fees overall and $25 million in advertising over a five-year period.

“Before any video can be viewed on Megavideo.com, the user must view an advertisement,” the indictment said.

The indictment says Megaupload did not host a search function on its site but instead relied on the sites that Dotcom owned and thousands of third-party “linking” sites pointed to copyrighted content on Megaupload. These third-party sites participated in the “uploader rewards” program and, according to the indictment, were paid “financial incentives” for their “linking” services.

And right after the SOPA protests this happens....

While it was used for Piracy, it also had plenty of legit uses as well....

It seems that retaliation has been swift...

*Grabs pitchforks and torches*


But seriously, while I do think that it wasn't all that great of a move, I'm pretty sure that it was done right after the protests on purpose. It just had to be.

Welp. This is only one of the dozens of file-sharing sites on the net, so I guess it's okay. And the few times I feel like pirating I use torents anyway.

Still, this was quite unexpected.

And now I've realised I won't be able to download that bunch of iPad e-books from there...

Great to know our lovely government also had a hand in it -.-

Well on the bright side, the Netherlands always seem to go incredible lengths to get Dutchmen tried in the Netherlands, which could end up being good news for the Dutch fellow. And maybe the opposition will bitch about it to the current government (I certainly hope they will), which is always fun. Though it probably won't help bringing MegaUpload back.

Also, did anyone else notice the irony in how none of the arrested people actually were Americans?

C'mon was anyone really NOT expecting this would happen?

Well, it was a site often used for online piracy.

It was a piracy site and I'm glad they were arrested. But by American cops?

Eh, megaupload sucked anyways. What with their membership crap and captcha and wait time with their adware-ridden popups. So if anything I'm glad it'll make people stop linking to it out of personal annoyement, even though I loathe copyright law.


Now, however, this is pretty bad because it will set a precedent for other hosting sites to be taken down similarly. With increasingly worse judgement. And no, saying "all hosting sites are filthy pirates" is simply not true.

I wouldn't say SOPA and PIPA were red herrings, but this is a reminder that they can already shut down websites like this.
(though yes, megaupload was mostly piracy)

Honestly? Good riddance. Megaupload was terrible and it deserved to be gone for various other reasons. God knows why anyone would upload to there.

I'm proud of those police officers for arresting the founder of Megupload. It's been a while since New Zealand police have done anything internationally newsworthy.

I won't argue that Megaupload was a pirating site and mostly crap at that, but SOPA and PIPA haven't been officially passed yet. If the US government is citing either of those bills as the thing that gave them authority to shut down Megaupload, they're basically using a power that they don't have yet. Which is illegal.

Whoa, when did THIS happen? Not that I ever use MegaUpload, but damn things are getting crazy on the internet.

Originally Posted by Nytie

I won't argue that Megaupload was a pirating site and mostly crap at that, but SOPA and PIPA haven't been officially passed yet. If the US government is citing either of those bills as the thing that gave them authority to shut down Megaupload, they're basically using a power that they don't have yet. Which is illegal.

They are not.

If this is meant to be retaliation, then it's a very odd form of it.

One of the main arguments against SOPA and PIPA was that laws already exist enabling the US government to deal with pirates. This basically proves that point, and makes SOPA and PIPA seem just as irrelevant as their opponents have been arguing.