Obviously I'd prefer you to lynch somebody else because I like taking part for as long as possible.So you wouldn't mind if we lynched you?
You don't owe me a reason for your vote on me but I am curious to know why there is 'evidence' to go on for it. I'm not trying to convince you to change it though. Keep it if you feel like it's the right one.I've gone over that several times, people can just scroll up if they want to see.
Reasons for players that are being voted. Tell me if I missed anything:
CrackFox: Is voting Sourcandy just because she acts scummy in every game she is in.
Yatagarasu: Says is against voting Sourcandy then votes her upon being reminded No lynch is not an option then unvoted her when action was pointed out.
Sourcandy: Voted self and is not defending herself really.
TheMissingno: First to vote Sourcandy
It's not so much a question of why other people are opposed to the Sourcandy wagon as it is a question of why you prefer to randomly lynch Sourcandy when other, non-random alternatives have been suggested.
The only reason I voted for SC was because there was already a lynch bandwagon against her. As I have said, I don't care who gets lynched (obviously I care if I get lynched because the game would end for me) if there was a mass vote against you I would have gone with it. Why? Because it's day one, without grasping at ridiculous reasoning we HAVE to lynch someone and whoever we choose the risk of lynching an innocent player will remain exactly the same, that's just the situation we find ourselves in. In hindsight we have had a successful first day, all this debating has given me quite a few suspicians, but that's all they are right now so I'm gonna keep my vote on whomever has the majority votes, and hope we get lucky. Hopefully by the next voting phase I will have enough reasons to vote a player in confidence, but right now, I don't.It's not so much a question of why other people are opposed to the Sourcandy wagon as it is a question of why you prefer to randomly lynch Sourcandy when other, non-random alternatives have been suggested.
Please explain why my case against Yatagarasu is flawed and undeserving of your vote - given that she herself admitted it was not flawed and was deserving of my vote.
If you're going to call all the options on the table "ridiculous reasoning" please be prepared to explain why.
This being your reasoning for voting Yata? I'm guessing you've never contradicted yourself in a mafia game before then? Nothing that Yata has said or done so far has struck me as scummy. Nor SC though I said, I only voted her to jump on the bandwagon. As a side not I did point out that SC avoided conversation which is quite a scummy thing to do, something which you also called Yata out for doing. We're all grasping at straws at this point, that is my point.A.) Yatagarasu believes voting for someone without evidence hurts the Town.
B.) Yatagarasu voted for someone without evidence.
C.) Yatagarasu believes she is hurting the Town.
I don't know anything you guys don't. I'm simply making assumptions from all the posts in thread so far. Right now, if you want me to give a name, I'd say HumanDawn was displaying the most scummy behavior. Refering to that long post in which he tried to contradict everyone on their SC vote. I don't see why a townie who doesn't know anything would be so passionate about saving a random player at this point. A player that has as much chance of being scum as the next person.@CrackFox; Mind sharing your suspicions with everyone else?
I didn't vote her for contradicting herself, I voted her for doing things that she believed would hurt the Town - that is the definition of Scum, I don't really see the disconnect here.
You've already explained why you originally voted for Sourcandy and I understand that, what I'm asking is why you're still voting for her when you called it random and there are now non-random options on the table.
EDIT: Before this thread devolves into Mew vs CrackFox: The above question applies to anyone voting for Sourcandy, as well as for anyone who does not currently have an active vote placed.
Last edited by Master Mew; 3rd April 2013 at 04:27 PM.
My vote is not placed because for now I am watching and still thinking. I made mistake earlier and I don't want to perform another move that can hurt the town.
I voted myself just to see how people would react to it. quite simple really. I don't have much time right now to read everything since I last posted, but I will later tonight and then, and only then you'll get something from me.
My life is a nightmare
She said doing it would hurt the town, then went and did it anyway. That is a contradiction. That strikes me as more of a confused player than a scummy one. Scummy ones are usually together and careful with their posts.I didn't vote her for contradicting herself, I voted her for doing things that she believed would hurt the Town - that is the definition of Scum, I don't really see the disconnect here.
I don't see any non-random options. If I thought it would stick, i'd start a lynch against HumanDawn but I know it wouldn't, so there's no point in me trying to vote him when it wouldn't achieve anything.You've already explained why you originally voted for Sourcandy and I understand that, what I'm asking is why you're still voting for her when you called it random and there are now non-random options on the table.
Why Humandawn? You can only know if you try.