Thing is that no matter what I say or do people still won't agree xD as you said before during the first phase you can either hit or miss.
Well if I were to vote I'll have to go for for...
The reason I vote for him is because he's the one that first one to vote for Sourcandy, even if it was to get things going or a joke it was still a vote, even if he ended up changing it later. Then there's the fact he judged Crack Fox and voted for him/her suddenly, I can understand that he had suspicions on her but I think that you should at least let the other person answer before you end up voting for them.
People tend to respond more seriously when they have a vote on them.Then there's the fact he judged Crack Fox and voted for him/her suddenly, I can understand that he had suspicions on her but I think that you should at least let the other person answer before you end up voting for them.
That's all I'll say in response to this baseless silliness.
Last edited by TheMissingno.; 2nd April 2013 at 11:00 PM.
To be honest, I'm more in the mood of observing what's going on than analyzing and doing much in this serious stage of Day 1. None of the wagons are strong enough to justify a vote on them in my opinion. I do have some things I really want to say, though.
Phoenix Wright: Justice For All ~ Examination (Moderato) Extended - YouTube
Yatagarasu; You were kidding about your vote on TheMissingno. right? When I saw the vote I saw no need to explain why it was flawed. It looked like a random vote to me, so explaining its invalidity was pointless. There was nothing that gave me the impression that it was a serious vote made in a playful way, which makes me ask you Master Mew what you saw in it that was serious enough that it made you bother to explain why the vote on TheMissingno. was so flawed in the first place.
Plus, by voting her, thinking that she needs one more vote to get her lynched, brings in the risk that someone would disagree with prematurely ending the phase and just vote her.
I don't think that's much of an excuse when I recall you posted what you think with your job too, but then you could just be busier now having more things to take care of.
With my post now that means every player has posted at least once in the thread, and thus two of who have already posted are Mafia. I'm not sure who to vote yet, but I think I will be when there's more posts and with more time.
@Zima; What do you have to say now?
Last edited by HumanDawn; 3rd April 2013 at 04:36 AM.
Mostly true but there is other elements to it. As i've already stated.It was the beginning of Day 1. You've done it plenty of times too. You chose her to get the ball rolling too.
The sudden switch from casual joking to analysing everything I said as if it mattered more than it did.Where did you get this impression in the first place?
Of course not but in another situation where we have to lynch someone and she's on the copping table anyway, then yes. I'm sure me and others would have been open to changing our vote by now if she's of spoken up a little.Does this mean that you'll always vote her in every game that she's in in Day 1?
To be honest with you Human, that sounds like bs to me. You do know that we have to lynch someone? It sucks for SC that it's her but there's nothing else to go on. She's likely as guilty or innocent as the rest of us if you don't have private information. You're protesting way too much for something that is inevitable. That post probably took a long time to put together and write and in the scheme of the rules, it's pointless for a townie to care that much for someone they don't know the allience of.To be honest, I'm more in the mood of observing what's going on than analyzing and doing much in this serious stage of Day 1.
I don't know about anyone else but this post has made me think...
Last edited by CrackFox; 3rd April 2013 at 09:08 AM.
The better question is, since Yatagarasu never said it was a joke, why are you speaking for her?
I did a vote count so I could keep track more easily:
Sourcandy: 3 (Sourcandy, CrackFox, Mutie)
TheMissingno: 1 (Flaze)
No Lynch: 1 (Zima)
Yatagarasu: 1 (Master Mew)
CrackFox: 1 (TheMissingno,)
(I might have missed something someone please correct if this is wrong.)
At this point, I don’t think there has been a solid case on anyone. However, I do find CrackFox a bit suspicious as she calls out Missy for starting a bandwagon on Sourcandy, but jumps on the bandwagon anyway. I think her reasoning is wrong for why Missy backed out of the lynch.
As for Yatagarasu:
Between Yatagarasu and CrackFox, I think she would be the better lynch.
As for Sourcandy herself, I have a null read on her.
@Foulcandy; what do you think of CrackFox’s opinion on you?
Last edited by Paperhorse; 3rd April 2013 at 11:47 AM. Reason: fixing voting
@Paperhorse; I unvoted Sourcandy which you actually have part of the quote in your post. On the note of it being a "deafeatist" attitude. Why should I be defensive over one vote which if someone else did the same thing I would have voted them for it.
I'm not entirely sure why I was quoted Mew. I've pretty much said all I have to say about this. I'm not sure why people have such a problem with lynching SC. If not her, who do ya'll suggest instead?
Right, and what is this 'evidence' you have against me?The problem we have with lynching SC is that there is no evidence against her.
To be honest, I don't mind who gets lynched today since it's completely random for me as a townie with no intel.