Thread: U.S. Elections Mafia ☆ 1/1/2013 ☆ ELECTION DAY "You Are All Winners..."

So we got three mafia in a row but we lost our doctor...

@Greece; Ah, looking back... you haven't been making too many posts. Mostly a vote on whatever bandwagon is going, questioning "has this now turned into a nameclaim raid", and asking what something meant, pretty much.

So, any insight you might want to offer on the game? Hell, maybe a nameclaim?

You guys want a name claim? I'm Harry Reid

@Greece; All right. (Not sure how this guy was relevant in the Election, couldn't see anything from a quick check but eh, I'll leave that for people that know things)

Do you have any particular suspects at the present?

Well it's just kind of the same thing you guys think, Buoy because of the posting style thing, but it could be faked so I'm not gonna jump onto some thing.

Do you guys think it's odd that TheMissingno. never used his ability? A theory I have is that the Republican scum already had have access to it, and as @Kaito Tenjo; said, the Flavor Text implied that Midorikawa's character bribed a "Secret Service Agent", somebody that has access to the White House. That is no one other than @Sputnik;, who has already been acting strange and oddly.

Yeah, and Insanish Danish's nameclaim of Gary Johnson's, a former Republican, isn't making me think "innocent". Do you guys remember Midorikawa and TheMissingno.'s act? Minutes before TheMissingno. came out with his cop fakeclaim, Midorikawa voted Insanish Danish. Now why the hell would she do that? I believe that it was an act to make Insanish Danish look innocent once Midorikawa turns up Mafia. Regarding the Independent Libertarian that needs to live until the end of the game to win theory, we've already had a cute, sweet little kitten that died who had such a win condition. Now if we were to assume Insanish Danish really is an Independent with such a win condition, what would somebody with such a win condition do? Oh that's right. Jump on bandwagons to get people lynched so they could get to the endgame closer. Come the recent lynch that was put on TheMissingno., and instead of voting him, she ignores it and doesn't vote at all. She also somewhat protected Gliscorman by saying that he's not coming off scummy to her too.

So yeah, I think I've made my point clear enough. VOTE: Insanish Danish

Whatever she is, she isn't a Democrat.

Vote: Insanish Danish

All of what Human pointed out and what I said before.

I think Insanish Danish is just and independent and pretty harmless. I also don't think that Sputnik has been converted. Out of everybody left Buoy has been coming off worse than anybody right now. I want to see what other people have to say first though while I go through the thread and look at posts.

Originally Posted by stillboy

I think Insanish Danish is just and independent and pretty harmless. I also don't think that Sputnik has been converted. Out of everybody left Buoy has been coming off worse than anybody right now. I want to see what other people have to say first though while I go through the thread and look at posts.

@Buoy; hasn't been able to post for a few days for some personal reason.

Even before that though I was suspicious of him. But it seems kinda low to go after him if he's not here to defend himself.

ok can somebody explain concisely why i am suspicious

Originally Posted by Buoy

ok can somebody explain concisely why i am suspicious

Excerpt from a recently run Super-PAC Ad:

"btw master mew could u pls send my role pm to me again bc i deleted it by accident"

The post sounded like something you'd write. It was the most recent post in the Mafia QT. Some think that it's a framing attempt. I mean, there are no full stops(just like the post you posted just now), your joke grammar is like that, and you're the only player in this game that uses "bc" to shorten the word "because".

oh, these super-pac ads are qt posts????? well i guess since that person sounds like me, it must obviously be me!!!! what i say either way won't make much of a difference, i guess, since i can't exactly defend myself against that sort of thing. on the other hand, apparently @stillboy; was suspicious of me before that, so i'd love it if he could explain why, exactly.

Originally Posted by Buoy

oh, these super-pac ads are qt posts????? well i guess since that person sounds like me, it must obviously be me!!!! what i say either way won't make much of a difference, i guess, since i can't exactly defend myself against that sort of thing. on the other hand, apparently @stillboy; was suspicious of me before that, so i'd love it if he could explain why, exactly.

It's not only that, but you defending and quickly believing TheMissingno.'s fake cop claim simply because of the lack of a counterclaim, when he said he got a "Mafia" on the Godfather, doesn't really sit right. Also saying that it's "Definitely possible" that a cop could get a Mafia on the Godfather without explaining yourself felt really odd. Anyway, yeah, I want to hear of what stillboy has to say as well.

I'd like him to shed some light on what he meant on page 9 about this:

http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/f362/u-s-elections-mafia-%E2%98%86-12-31-2012-%E2%98%86-day-6-ugh-feathers-everywhere-143061/index9.html#post4509967

Originally Posted by HumanDawn

Originally Posted by Buoy

oh, these super-pac ads are qt posts????? well i guess since that person sounds like me, it must obviously be me!!!! what i say either way won't make much of a difference, i guess, since i can't exactly defend myself against that sort of thing. on the other hand, apparently @stillboy; was suspicious of me before that, so i'd love it if he could explain why, exactly.

It's not only that, but you defending and quickly believing TheMissingno.'s fake cop claim simply because of the lack of a counterclaim, when he said he got a "Mafia" on the Godfather, doesn't really sit right. Also saying that it's "Definitely possible" that a cop could get a Mafia on the Godfather without explaining yourself felt really odd. Anyway, yeah, I want to hear of what stillboy has to say as well.

I'd like him to shed some light on what he meant on page 9 about this:

http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/f362/u-s-elections-mafia-%E2%98%86-12-31-2012-%E2%98%86-day-6-ugh-feathers-everywhere-143061/index9.html#post4509967

i didn't defend his claim. i merely said i believed him, and, yes, there was no counterclaim or proof that he was not the cop at the time, so i had no real reason not to believe him, or at least no reason not to go with what he was saying, especially since he did actually uncover a mafia. since getting a mafia check on a godfather is not IMPOSSIBLE, it is, by definition, 'definitely possible', and so i was right in saying what i said. i don't see why i have to have had explained myself about it being possible, because it's really not hard to grasp why.