
Originally Posted by
Belarus.
Yeah, and I would sacrifice myself to kill a townie by making myself so obvious. I claim crap like Restless Spirit and Oracle when I'm mafia and can't claim my real ability. Bomb is just stupid to claim when one's mafia. v.v
Lynch me, sure, but you'll probably just lose two townies. You might get lucky and have a mafia die, but honestly, the chances of that are very slim.
First part of that: I hate when people use the I wouldn't be so obvious excuse. Reverse psychology exists and mafia can frequently get away with it.
Second, if you suspect most of the people voting you, why do you think a townie will die?

Originally Posted by
NfiNity
Unvote: Meron.
Vote: Hitomi.
The way you keep getting on Belarus. and Russia. makes me think you're mafia and are trying to early on catch very little evidence to start a bandwagon on either one. Like I said before, Belarus. said she was fine getting lynched if that somehow cleared Russia., making me think she's innocent for saying such a thing. I don't think a mafioso would bus her teammate like that.
You're doing the same exact thing with Hitomi, except with even
less evidence. A bomb claim and buddying is suspicious and on Day 1 when there's not much else to go on, it's enough to make a vote.

Originally Posted by
HilbertCressLover

Originally Posted by
The Puppetmaster

Originally Posted by
HilbertCressLover
I was thinking of doing this before. I'm also suspicious of The Puppetmaster, but Hitomi even more so.
For trying to get info? Wow.
That could be anyone's excuse. The way you and Hitomi are both so dead set on Russia. and Belarus., even though they haven't done much to be suspicious of, but just because they're mostly using meta as examples to defend themselves, is suspicious to me. Belarus even claimed and said she'd be fine getting out to clear Russia.. Even though the majority would not let friendships be the way to make alliances, that doesn't mean Belarus. and Russia. can't think differently about it.
Their reasoning is:
1) Belarus defending Russia day 1 with no reason.
2) Belarus's bomb claim.
3) Meta defenses
Your reasoning:
1) Questioning/voting Russia and Belarus
Just saying, they have more. And while they can think differently, just remember votes should be based on the game, not friendships or meta.

Originally Posted by
NfiNity
Bomb is usually what a mafioso would claim, so I don't think she would openly do that probably knowing it would make her suspicious.
To be honest, day 1 is never a good time to find a lot of evidence since a lot never usually happens. The way everyone kinda "jumped" on her seems like a mafia type of thing to happen since then if she gets lynched, you could just say "Oh, we didn't have enough evidence and she seemed suspicious, so...".
Only 3 people voted Belarus. And technically on Fahrenheit and myself could even be considered as "jumping to it, yet you vote Hitomi? Plus after you voted Hitomi, three others jumped on, but that's not suspicious either?

Originally Posted by
Hitomi

Originally Posted by
HilbertCressLover
But the thing is, I don't even find Belarus. or Russia.'s behavior scummy, which is why I find you suspicious instead.
They're not suspicious therefore I am.
Bye logic, try not to let the door hit you on the way out.
Just because you don't find someone scummy, doesn't mean the people voting them are. Especially on Day 1.

Originally Posted by
NfiNity
It's not that, I just think the way you're acting and trying to hard to find very little evidence on either is really suspicious. I wouldn't vote you if I didn't think the way you were acting was scummy.
You're doing the same thing to Hitomi.

Originally Posted by
NfiNity

Originally Posted by
DrumBeats
Also, I dont see any logic behind this Hitomi bandwagon. She's getting voted for voting for someone suspicious, and calling out potetial mafia buddying. She seems protown to me.
Did you read any of Belarus., Russia., HCL's, and my posts? If you did, you would've seen our evidence.
There's not much evidence to look at to be honest
Bookmarks