It was aimed at Neonsands. Unless I'm missing something, my options are insane/sane/mafia, so I don't get why he won't mention the insane possibility.
If I were to be mafia, you would have to be insane, Tris and Sourcandy would make for the Sane/Paranoid and Soulmaster would be Naive.
For Soulmaster to be mafia, you would be sane, I would be insane, Sourcandy would be paranoid and Tris would be naive.
The only distinction I have between that, was I was the second person and first person to claim my result. That wouldn't end well if somebody else managed to have a conflicting result. Granted, I could have taken a risk, but why would I kill of Sourcandy? The same results as me would be a perfect person to have as my counter claim. There would be no evidence either way.
Now, notice who didn't have a result for our first check? Soulmaster. Why? Probably because he didn't want to risk being counterclaimed.
Granted, all speculation now, but that is how it is.
I suppose it is between us then.
Neonsands argument makes sense. You not getting in a check on night 1 was definitely a mafias way out. You seem like the best choice.
Um guys night 1 was on saturday right?
I was out of town friday-late sunday so any nights in there I was gone so that wouldn't have worked out for me.
Sorry I'm late guys
And then they killed him, thinking he was sure to be the mafia, however as quickly as he killed, he died
DrumBeats was the mafia, he won the game
So... If I was insane, why did you tell me DrumBeats showed up as mafia? If he was mafia, he should have shown up as innocent.
Crap,I was sane.
Did I? Guess I confused you with Sourcandy