Thread: Pokemon Best Wishes! Mafia - ENDGAME! - VICTORY FOR TOWN AND INDEP 10/11/12!

VOTE: Mijzelffan

For vig-killing me not once, but twice before. XD

Originally Posted by KidBeano

Vote: Karamazov for useless reasoning and casting a vote on someone already with a vote.

I like how you're ignoring Rio's reasoning ("because crack is whack.") and Leavanny's "Vote: Gotpika for misspelling Gothita." Seems a little odd that you would single me out.

And if I vote for someone who already has a vote, then at least I'm helping to lynch someone, whether they be good or evil. It's moving things along.

Unvote: Gotpika

Vote: CrackFox sudden suspicion.

Originally Posted by Karamazov

Originally Posted by KidBeano

Vote: Karamazov for useless reasoning and casting a vote on someone already with a vote.

I like how you're ignoring Rio's reasoning ("because crack is whack.") and Leavanny's "Vote: Gotpika for misspelling Gothita." Seems a little odd that you would single me out.

And if I vote for someone who already has a vote, then at least I'm helping to lynch someone, whether they be good or evil. It's moving things along.

They're obviously random joke votes, and while I think they're stupid and tacky, I do not care for them. Yours, however, was that you had a "gut feeling", implying they actually seem suspicious to you and you genuinely want them lynched. It was not joke reasoning.

Voting somebody who already has a vote on them on Day 1 is an odd move - we don't want to lynch just for the sake of "moving things along", because nine times out of ten, it'll come around to bite us in the backside. We want to lynch when we find someone suspicious, not because you had a "gut feeling" less than half an hour into the game.

Originally Posted by KidBeano

They're obviously random joke votes, and while I think they're stupid and tacky, I do not care for them. Yours, however, was that you had a "gut feeling", implying they actually seem suspicious to you and you genuinely want them lynched. It was not joke reasoning.

Except my reason, like theirs, wasn't based on logic or deductive reasoning. I just went with it because I felt like it. I have a 50/50 chance of lynching someone in the mafia, anyway.

Voting somebody who already has a vote on them on Day 1 is an odd move - we don't want to lynch just for the sake of "moving things along", because nine times out of ten, it'll come around to bite us in the backside. We want to lynch when we find someone suspicious, not because you had a "gut feeling" less than half an hour into the game.

You forget, I'm really terrible at mafia games.

At any rate, I'm staying with my vote until I have better evidence to vote for someone else. A gut feeling is all I have to work with, so I'm going to use it. @CrackFox; care to convince me not to vote for you?

Vote: Rio Kamishiro

i don't trust u for liking alit so suddenly instead of kaito!!! >:/

Originally Posted by Atomic

Vote: Rio Kamishiro

i don't trust u for liking alit so suddenly instead of kaito!!! >:/

Guuuurl, I love both. <3

Now then, I find it a bit odd people jumped onto the CrackFox bandwagon when I only did it as a joke. And I mean, I don't really object, but yeah.

The Crackfox bandwagon picked up speed suspiciously quickly. Everyone on it has earned a FoS from me for the next couple phases.

But I just started it like how everyone else starts random votes. I certainly wasn't expecting a bandwagon.

Hmm, I suspect Master Mew......

Originally Posted by Leavanny Duo

Hmm, I suspect Master Mew......

...For... what? My... sexy avatar...?

No. Heck no.

Maybe he's mafioso....... Again.

... Yeah, I'm confused. :/

Originally Posted by Leavanny Duo

No. Heck no.

Maybe he's mafioso....... Again.

You and I have very different definitions of "again."

I was an independent in our last game.

Originally Posted by Karamazov

Except my reason, like theirs, wasn't based on logic or deductive reasoning. I just went with it because I felt like it.

"Because I felt like it" is not reasoning. You're trying to justify your vote with flawed "logic" (if I dare even call it that). THAT'S the problem.

I have a 50/50 chance of lynching someone in the mafia, anyway.

If we assume a reasonable 3:1 ratio of town:mafia, then that means there's about 7 mafia. 7 mafia out of 30 people. 7/30 chance of hitting a mafia. 7/30 =/= 1/2. :/

At any rate, I'm staying with my vote until I have better evidence to vote for someone else. A gut feeling is all I have to work with, so I'm going to use it. @CrackFox; care to convince me not to vote for you?

>a gut feeling is all I have to work with

Oh sure, it's not like scumhunting exists at all. Nope. Ridiculous notion.

What can he do to stop you from voting him? He's not done anything suspicious. What's he going to do, say "I'm not mafia" and you go "Oh, ok then, I'll try this strategy on someone else until someone confesses"? ._.