About that pending... what's up with game updates lately?
Sorry for the inactivity.
Those were your two posts Day 1. You didn't vote, didn't reaction test, and didn't further the conversation. I know I'm not much of one to talk, but I'd consider Stuntology more pro-town than you from what I've seen so far.
>Criticizes another player for voting no lynch
Edit: Figured I should tag her too. @Nepeta Leijon; you forgot to post the update.
Last edited by Feralize; 13th March 2013 at 05:32 AM. Reason: apparently i don't know how to count
Stuntology voted no lynch at the start of D1. That can only be negative for Town because:
1) We do not discuss at D1 therefore we get no info. On the other hand if we discuss, reach no conclusion and then vote a no lynch it is fine. because we have worked on something and we have "reads" that can be used later. By voting immediately a no lynch it gives Mafia the chance of 1 free kill.
2) At the end of N1 we cannot connect the death with anyone as there have been no conversations which makes that persons death gives us no info. As i said free kill for Mafia.
3) At D2 we are back to scratch and without a doctor. Which will be likely another easy kill for Mafia at N2.
Callisto's post (the one prior to Stuntology's first) was made at 10:32PM EDT on March 8th.
Stuntology's post was made at 1:51PM EDT on March 9th.
I don't see the issue with voting NL when there is no conversation going on whatsoever and the phase was going to end in roughly 5 hours.
I already addressed that and while it's a valid point, you posted but didn't make any real contributions which is almost as bad.
True, but the fact that he just came in and voted no lynch over doing anything else bothers me. What would the point of doing that be unless he just wanted to make it look like he was being active? Just voting no lynch does absolutely nothing for the town, but makes it look like he was active, and I don't get why a townie would bother doing that; faking activity really kinda only benefits the mafia.
Sorry to disrupt the flow here, but is the phase still going since the update hasn't been posted?
Also, yeah, I initially saw Stuntology's voting NL the way Feralize saw it. I think of all the mafia games I've played here, only once has a D1 lynch actually had a lynch go through. I didn't really think it was all that bad for him to vote that way, since it looked like the lynch was going to end up in a NL regardless. Then, I saw Akuraito's reasoning behind why a NL vote could be detrimental and took note of that. I voted for Stuntology because I felt like (at the time) there was no other direction to go in and I don't think we should make a pattern out of participating in discussions without actually going anywhere with them, in terms of voting someone.
Anyway I am not sure if I am the only one that didn't posts and I won't bother to check as all votes were joke votes which is pretty much as useful as FoSing the host.
D1 started at "9th March 2013, 12:57 AM". Stuntology posted at "9th March 2013, 08:51 PM". The update was at "11th March 2013, 04:02 AM". At my time but the time deference is the same. That means that Stuntology posted 8 hours after the start and the update was on 11th March which is over a day later. That means that we had plenty if time to discuss even though we didn't. Also coming back to a point you made previously (don't remember exactly where) about Stuntology trying to start conversation with his vote. To me it looks like he was trying to eliminate any possibility of conversation and teh personw ho actually started something was GliscorMan.
I would vote for m0cking because I feel he contributed even less than Stuntology did.
- The votes closed last night, and Stuntology's lynch goes through.
- The host extends the phase to allow us to vote, and I propose a lynch for information. Meaning, we lynch whoever we collectively think will provide the most leads.
[removed like half of this post because i can't count]
EDIT: Wow I just realized how screwed up my math is. Okay guys, I see what you're saying about the timing.
Last edited by Feralize; 13th March 2013 at 07:55 AM. Reason: what is this "math" you speak of
Also, m0ckingbird, why did you leave your vote on Stuntology when you FoSed him? If you were going to do that, you could've unvoted him afterward. I'm confused, lol.
Anyway overall I want to say I did not expect my vote on Stunt to be passed so lightly and lead to his lynch, at least not without a decent amount of conversation fist. Well we do have quite a conversation right now but it's a bit late for changing votes or finding a better possibly target... Anyway I hope I made clear my train of thought which indeed is not the best reason for someone to be lynched but currently he is my best read and I do not think not lynching on D2 would be a great idea as Mafia already got an easy kill on N1 after the lack of activity from almost everyone.
I double posted so i am removing the second post and adding here instead.
Last edited by m0ckingbird20; 13th March 2013 at 08:24 AM.
Just in response to Feralize and m0ckingbird's discussion as to whether I think he's town or not, I think that the fact that he was gunning for me so hard shows that he probably isn't mafia, because (in my opinion) voting me was a pretty rash decision that the mafia probably wouldn't make because they can discuss their moves with each other.