Thread: Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones Mafia - ENDGAME [7/28] DB AND JOLTIK WIN!

Originally Posted by GengarWithSunglasses

Unvote: Paperhorse
Okay, I'll unvote her. I'm inexperienced with mafia games and I didn't think any evidence would show up. I guess I'll withdraw my vote. Now I know not to do random votes on day 2.

I didn't just post a post of everything HCL's said for no reason.

It's fine. I'm not a confirmed innocent. I have no real defense, and my death won't really affect anybody. Go ahead.

Giving up? Wow.

Well what can I do?

^Make more of a defense than "I'm new"?

Well, to err is only human. Everyone makes mistakes.

You are making yourself more suspicious by the second.

Really? 'Cause it's true. Haven't you done anything wrong in your life? All people have. We must fix them, so I unvoted Paperhorse and took responsibility for my mistake. It's my fault, I feel guilty and apologized.

... Gengar...

Ok, look. You voted randomly on day 2. When we already have some information (I stand corrected from what I said last post) of voting patterns. I know you are new. But you can't just do that.

To make a random lynch on day 2 is a suspicious move. And then your defense is "I'm new"?

Vote: GengarWithSunGlasses

Please make a better defense.

GengarWithSunglasses: III (Belarus., @Russia.;, Canada*)

HETALIA BANDWAGON, FOR REAL!

Vote: GengarWithSunglasses.

That defense just seems like something a mafioso would do. And not to mention that random lynch(even if you did unvote) when Belarus. put up HCL's post quotes.

Dang it, NfiNity ruined it. :c

Originally Posted by Belarus.

Dang it, NfiNity ruined it. :c

I-I'm sorry. XD

Unless he comes up with a better defense, my vote is staying where it is.

Okay, uh, let's calm down for a moment before bandwagonning GWS because he random voted?

Originally Posted by Russia.

Vote: GengarWithSunglasses

That is one of the worst reasonings I have ever read. Random voting instead of waiting for evidence to pop up? This isn't day 1.

"Evidences" don't just pop up because it's not day 1. For that there has to be analysis of the other players' posts, role claims, interactions between the players or something, which is what GWS has just done. If we just sit there and twiddle our thumbs while waiting for someone to do something, well, the game will fall in a state of follow the leader, which is not a good thing at all. That's without mentioning the inactivity that comes with it if said leader dies or is converted or whatever.

Originally Posted by Belarus.

???

Anyways, I agree with @Russia.;. Random lynching isn't going to help the town right now, and you trying to lynch Paperhorse just to have a lynch is really quite scummy.

Vote: GengarWithSunglasses

He didn't try to get Paperhorse lynched, he voted for her. That vote has about as much basis as a day 1 random vote. Right now is the beginning of the phase; there's about 21 hours left before the update, so a single little vote won't cause Paperhorse to be lynched. I don't know what's this mindset that voting for someone = that person will be lynched, but it's wrong. Votes change during a phase as people keep discussing who should be lynched.

Originally Posted by Russia.

You're not gonna try to defend yourself? :P

Okay. :)

He can't just pull arguments to defend himself out of thin air, either. There's always role claiming, but what if he has an important role? Putting someone under the spotlight just to have them publicly claim is terribad.

And just like that, giving up does not mean that the person who's being bandwagonned is mafia. If I was bandwagonned for a reason as terrible as this one, I'd probably give up, too.

Now let's compare the situation from an outsider's perspective:

>GWS random voted for Paperhorse in the hope of striking up a conversation or getting the town to do something.
>People call him out on his terrible reasoning for "wanting to lynch Paperhorse" (which is not what he was doing).
>He's bandwagonned because his reasoning for voting for someone is terrible.

Bandwagons are hurtful to the town when the reasoning is so bad. It doesn't give off anything to go on afterward.