That's a pretty ominous statement, Midorikawa. Thank you, though -- you've made people aware of the fact that I didn't participate in the night phase, either! Did I hear myself becoming semi-cleared? I think so.Originally Posted by Midorikawa
Okay, guys, so we can guess that, in the interests of balancing the game, there are two mafia. Out of the eight of us remaining, six are townies. Now that we've got those facts out of the way, it's time to start looking at individual cases.
Mijzelffan: Participating a lot and accusing people freely. However, I wouldn't say that some of his arguments are really the strongest, stating that he made 'multiple valid deductions'. I don't necessarily agree. What he pointed out against eeveeforthebest wasn't really much to warrant a lynch, especially Day 1 -- considering only four posts were made, I think it would have been wiser to wait until later on before trying to make a case.
I see what you mean by his tendency to agree with other people, but agreeing with things doesn't really make a person that suspicious, especially considering that he was adding on small bits and pieces when he was agreeing with people, which makes him look like he's trying to be more helpful than anything else. I don't particularly see where you're getting the 'neutrality' vibe. Additionally, he didn't really contradict himself -- you can still randomvote and not want a lynch. One vote won't make much of a difference to anybody unless nobody else votes at all, and he did say that he was only voting 'until everyone had spoken', and he stated that he wouldn't 'try to lynch anybody until I'm 90% sure that they're mafia', and the latter statement augments his pro-no lynch stance, rather than contradicting it. You didn't even say why he was neutral, why he was contradicting his pro-no lynch stance -- you just stated that he was, and you can't really state things without evidence to back it up.
I'm not really sure what to think about you. I'd err on the side of town if I absolutely had to make a choice, though. The fact that you were vague on Day 1 is fine, considering that there wasn't a lot to go on, but it makes me feel a bit weird that you tried to make a definite case out of it, especially when you hadn't really backed it up with anything substantial. You could have said that about anybody in the game, technically -- you didn't do anything to make it specific to eeveeforthebest except say his name. I just think that maybe that's you being a little misguided seeing as it's early in the game, and the way you insisted that you were right is a common enough behaviour for you, imo (StubbornMafiaPlayersShipping didn't get its name for no reason). Is that meta I'm using? Yes. But Buoy, isn't it wrong to use meta? It's okay to use meta as long as you're a professional like me, don't worry. Besides, you were 100% right in what you said to m0ckingbird, as far as I'm concerned.
m0ckingbird20: I always see you as a player who manages to draw themselves a lot of flak early in the game, as you're sort of in the same vein as Zima and Spectrum Achromatic -- people seem to always find you scummy. Putting past games out of my head, I would say in this one that there's a definite chance that you're scum. Mijzelffan already pointed out the personal attacks, which are both really rude and also very unnecessary -- the fact that you feel the need to make jibes at him just makes me think that you feel your argument isn't substantial without them. You're also a little bit of a hypocrite, as Mijzelffan also pointed out -- you don't tell someone that they're doing something wrong when you've just done it, and then you also turn around and do it again. You also placed an FoS on Mijz right after he placed one on you, and I don't know whether that's a 'rookie mistake' (as much as I hate calling them that) or just a very blatant show of scumosity (I like making up words). Leaning scum on you.
PerseusRad: No real read on him yet. @PerseusRad; You said that you thought eeveeforthebest was pro-town. Can you explain exactly why you feel that he's town, rather than just saying it?
I can't comment on anybody else because nobody else has really been active enough to warrant a read. I'm also not specifically commenting on eeveeforthebest so that I don't feed PerseusRad anything that he can just paraphrase to respond to my question.
Going to throw this vote out here for now: