i think youre wrong, we need 2 spice this up a lil
i think youre wrong, we need 2 spice this up a lil
First off, I think applause is in order for Froakie's FT. The added dialogue before the game's opening was interesting to read and may as well be canon.
Now, before we actually start voting anyone seriously I'd like to establish something.
Are we okay with agreeing that the Mafia are all the culprits that had killed someone and had a trial set for them?
#spoilers of everyone that had a trial for them and killed somebody
Last edited by HumanDawn; 20th August 2013 at 05:32 PM.
Lol this game is going to be so fun, I bet I'll miss loads of information because I don't want to be spoiled.
Why would you insist on having people agree on something that can not only spoiler everyone who hasn't finished dangan ronpa yet, but can also make people accidently give away their role causing them to be modkilled agreeing/disagreeing with you. On top of that it doesn't really matter much who the mafia are, since you know, we can't nameclaim. Just have everyone agree there are probably 4 mafia if you must have everyone agree on something (though then again I'm not sure why you're so adamant on having people agree on that).
Also the rp thing.
Hold on a second. Jasper, Human and FA got Froakie's permission to post the skit.
Also, there is a chance that Human didn't even think about the possibility of people revealing their roles after suggesting that idea. It's only something to think about. Don't you think you're jumping to conclusions a little bit too quickly?
On this same note(I agree with what Zima said on all this but to add another point that your vote seems a little hasty), I think the intention of his post was not for nameclaim's but for roleclaim's.
Hence this part right here;
As I stated before, random lynches can be beneficial but we could potentially hurt ourselves more with a no lynch on a very good role.Originally Posted by Human
Case open, Case shut
It's pretty obvious that if you say "the mafia are these people" and you're wrong there's a chance someone will slip up and give a less obvious version of "nope, because I am that person and am innocent." There's no way he wouldn't think of that.Also, there is a chance that Human didn't even think about the possibility of people revealing their roles after suggesting that idea. It's only something to think about. Don't you think you're jumping to conclusions a little bit too quickly?
Also, I don't see how anyone would be revealing what role they had by agreeing with him unless they blatantly say what their role was. I doubt anyone would be crazy enough to do that.
As for the spoilers, it's clearly stated that this game will have spoilers in it, so I think everyone is prepared for that.
Froakie specifically stated this will be a spoiler full game. As long as we keep important plots in spoiler tags, I don't see the problem with stating possibilites based on the storyline
All you need is M-E-G-A-N-E
to answer human's question i respectfully disagree with his assumption :) but for the purposes of not wasting my time or anyone else's time because there's no point debating roles in a game without nameclaims i'm not going to go into it
Chances are he's just attempting to take a leading role in the proceedings right out of the gate rather than attempt to mislead the town so there's no need to view his actions as suspicious right now in my opinion (altho monokuma avatar? fishy).
I think it's most likely that Human was just trying to throw some theories around, I wont look into it too much but I guess it's something to keep in mind. @Buoy; Why did you vote for Harpy, I know 'to spice things up' but why her, you could have chosen anyone of us?
Trying to establish which characters could be mafia can be helpful even without being able to nameclaim, because it could help narrow down who to look for in possible FT and in what manner they are mentioned in, to see if it lines up with anyone, and such things have come in handy in some games. With the exception of one player probably, everyone here has played in multiple games, so there's not really any risk in accidentally nameclaiming that isn't already in any other game that does not allow nameclaiming.
But even if you found it annoying, I don't see how that is actually indicative of scum? The other reason you gave I can understand, but with the "rp thing" tacked on, it sort of comes across like you were looking for a reason to vote Human because of that.You're legally allowed to spam me the same message over and over again on skype untill I block you but just because you're allowed to doesn't mean I won't find it annoying.
If you acknowledge that the nightkills don't give us much to work with, it doesn't make much sense to me that you'd also not want a lynch. A lot of the same types of conversations do seem to happen on Day 1 as a result of someone being lynched/almost lynched and I agree, but there can often be something taken from them or something that is useful later.Originally Posted by Momoka
So I guess I'm confused, are you saying you don't think a Day 1 lynch at all in this case is best, or that joke voting often causes the "endless conversation?" Because from the way you describe what often gets discussed, it sounds more like you think that discussion that comes from joke votes is problematic rather than actually lynching someone.
hello everybody! My name is Pein and I suck at everything, including playing mafia games. Here's some things I want to keep in mind:
-rp is indeed annoying
-I didn't see humandawn as adamant as mijzellfan says
-i think lynching is the best of both illness, at least it provides some insight
given that, I'll Vote-sorry-: Momoka
sorry but if I'm not wrong, you were the one that brought the no lynch up. and i totally disagree with that. A no lynch because of a tie, or ability or whatever is acceptable for me as votes are still cast and information can be inferred, but agreeing to cause a no lynch? sorry but...no.
Rex Max Ben Sam Dan Dallas Ed
I can see it from both sides. On one hand a no lynch offers very little info but on the other lynching someone on day 1 is usually signing an innocent persons' death warrant, not so bad when you think how big the town faction still is at this point but it depends who we accidentally take out, it could be someone with a really crucial role for all we know. I'd probably prefer a lynch over nothing but i'll at least wait a fair bit before deciding who deserves the vote. Voting Momoka for suggesting a no lynch seems stupid to me. As i've said, there are good reasons for both lynch/no lynch on day one.
I agree with waiting later in the phase to cast a vote, when we know more. I'd hate to mislynch some innocent just as much as I'd hate a no lynch, both are unhelpful to the town.