You could claim to me. <3
You could claim to me. <3
No more dreaming of the dead, as if death itself was undone.
No more calling like a crow for a boy, for a body in the garden.
No more dreaming like a girl, so in love, so in love;
No more dreaming like a girl, so in love, so in love!
No more dreaming like a girl, so in love with the wrong world.
@Gotpika
As I said before, I realize that we have very little to be working with here, evidence-wise. Initially, I only voted you to get a reaction/response (with some hopes that somebody would find some more substantial evidence in the meantime), but your response just hasn't really convinced me to take my vote off.
I would risk a lynch, because risks are sometimes justified in these games. Nobody wants this situation to repeat for the next day phase. Nobody wants to be at a total loss for a lynch target. If you truly are town, then yes, I will assuredly be under suspicion, but so will various other people, and some information might be gathered. If you're mafia, then hurray, we might be able to look at those who even subtly defended you.
So yes, I agree that I'm not exactly voting off of much evidence. Hell, my "evidence" is only that observation of your liking votes. But still, I don't want town to be totally lost again. Early in the game, these types of things won't be too crippling, and honestly, I am a strong proponent of not letting no-lynch happen.

Actually if I can defend Gotpika's case, I've been on and checking the thread too, I just still don't know what to say yet so that's always an option.
I say claim to who you think is trustable, except Human though in thread might be better for you since no one is truly trustworthy
It's more of him being on and not saying anything at all. You at least spoke day one. There's also his current posts that have no town proof to them really, at least to me
"I'm coming like a wyvern in heat."
And what hasn't convinced you? Please tell me, because your motives again seems very minuscule.
Oh, no. I know very well about the risk of lynching in games. But what doesn't make sense to me and what it really making me wonder is why you're lynching for petty reasons, with really no proof, when I've proved myself with various responses regarding my activity.I would risk a lynch, because risks are sometimes justified in these games. Nobody wants this situation to repeat for the next day phase. Nobody wants to be at a total loss for a lynch target. If you truly are town, then yes, I will assuredly be under suspicion, but so will various other people, and some information might be gathered. If you're mafia, then hurray, we might be able to look at those who even subtly defended you.
I agree about no-lynches, but the thing is my story is whole and there are zero holes thus far in my logic or what I have said. You're clearly just voting on whim and anyone worth their salt wouldn't be trying so hard to vote someone off someone with exactly zero percent evidence aside from "activity and post likes". This is why I'm suspicious of how tenacious you are to get rid of me FA. You're not answering me.So yes, I agree that I'm not exactly voting off of much evidence. Hell, my "evidence" is only that observation of your liking votes. But still, I don't want town to be totally lost again. Early in the game, these types of things won't be too crippling, and honestly, I am a strong proponent of not letting no-lynch happen.
Like I said, I'm not claiming this early in-game at all.
I still wonder why you guys are keeping your votes on me, despite FA's reasons being a load of "the blind leading the blind."
Being busy when you admit to be on the forums for more than a few minutes isn't an excuse.
"I'm coming like a wyvern in heat."
Its definitely true that we don't have any evidence at all of you being mafia, Gotpika, and that we're only basing your suspicion off the fact that you liked a post. At this point we really are going nowhere, but having a no lynch day wouldn't help us either.
I'm also FoS on Human being he's independent we have to make sure that he isn't anti-town.
"I'm coming like a wyvern in heat."
I could have sworn I said I was "secretly" on Bulbagarden, I'm not spending time posting. I'm checking blogs and manga forum post and leaving quickly and I was on Serebii too. You're not making any sense.
@Elysion; At least you admit that your motives for voting me are a load of crock.
Honestly, I don't trust the ones who easily bandwagoned with no real reason.
Unvote:Greece
Vote:FinalArcadia
@Gotpika
What hasn't convinced me? I know that, like you said, people are all different about this sort of thing, but I hardly think that claiming that you didn't want people at school to see you on a Pokemon forum is a rock-solid defense. It's something that could be a convenient, fabricated defense. You could be completely truthful, but I'm just not willing to take everything at face value in mafia games.
We have no proof of anything right now. It is a petty reason to vote, but you know, I want to do something. This day phase was pretty much ineffectual until now. I'm trying to prevent that for future phases, as I said before.
Why did I target you? Because your day one behavior stood out in my mind most. I would be just as tenacious in my defense as I am now to anybody who I decided to target, because I'm not the type to be weak-willed. If I'm going to do something, I'm going to do it at full-force.
I agree with Elysion, everyone just seems to be looking for a random person to lynch so that we can get more information, you've got to admit that turning your suspicions on Gotpika just because he liked a post are a little silly.
LOL! Last time Gotpika claimed to me I got him nightkilled a few phases later. So yeah, I'm not a good choice to claim to xD.
Greece is an odd choice to vote on. FA does have the most justification to vote for, yet it's still weak.
How about finding new defense material instead of I didn't want to be seen at school. Human you're not trustworthy because you admitted to being an independent and to defending Gotpika out of friendship.
"I'm coming like a wyvern in heat."
Bookmarks