Thread: The Situation Room 2.0

Originally Posted by Master Mew

I'm not radically opposed to the idea of a Medium Game queue.

On another topic: I'm trying to decide on a good theme for Role Madness II. The first game consisted of an improbable combination of Superheroes/Supervillains, Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel protagonists/antagonists, and classic Disney heroes/villains.

As you can see, the main problem here is that the first game covered pretty much everything...

What is Role Madness?

Originally Posted by Master Mew

I'm saying that hosts are pragmatic and that if they know from the beginning that they're going to have to wait three months to post a Large Game, but significantly less time for a Small Game, hosts are going to be more inclined to create Small Games.

Evidently not, considering there are only 4 Small games waiting, and 13 Large games...

This is just a simple 'supply and demand' thing. The fact is that more hosts are interested in Large games, so it makes sense to supply the most spaces for them. If suddenly Small games become all the rage, then the system can be adjusted. If you were a manufacturer and people wanted Product A over Product B, you wouldn't produce more of Product B than of Product A - you'd probably end up bankrupting yourself.

Originally Posted by Master Mew

I'm not radically opposed to the idea of a Medium Game queue.

On another topic: I'm trying to decide on a good theme for Role Madness II. The first game consisted of an improbable combination of Superheroes/Supervillains, Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel protagonists/antagonists, and classic Disney heroes/villains.

As you can see, the main problem here is that the first game covered pretty much everything...

Well just do other ones from that. There are plenty of ones that weren't used.
You could even do the lesser known ones, that would be fun.

and @Midorikawa; It is exactly what it says, Role Madness. The roles are completely crazy. It is the main OP game. Sad how the first one died :(

I like the idea of medium games. Small should be not more than 10 people, medium should be not more than 18 and large can be 18+.

Originally Posted by Human

I like the idea of medium games. Small should be not more than 10 people, medium should be not more than 18 and large can be 18+.

With that plan, small and medium overlap, so you can't exactly do it like that.

Originally Posted by Buoy

Originally Posted by Human

I like the idea of medium games. Small should be not more than 10 people, medium should be not more than 18 and large can be 18+.

With that plan, small and medium overlap, so you can't exactly do it like that.

That would make small games up to 10, medium 11-18, and large 19+

Originally Posted by Midorikawa

Originally Posted by Buoy

Originally Posted by Human

I like the idea of medium games. Small should be not more than 10 people, medium should be not more than 18 and large can be 18+.

With that plan, small and medium overlap, so you can't exactly do it like that.

That would make small games up to 10, medium 11-18, and large 19+

Yes, but that isn't what Human said.

Originally Posted by Buoy

Originally Posted by Midorikawa

Originally Posted by Buoy

Originally Posted by Human

I like the idea of medium games. Small should be not more than 10 people, medium should be not more than 18 and large can be 18+.

With that plan, small and medium overlap, so you can't exactly do it like that.

That would make small games up to 10, medium 11-18, and large 19+

Yes, but that isn't what Human said.

It was implied. In skype we discussed small games being up to 13, medium 14-18/19/20, and large games 19/20/21+

Originally Posted by Midorikawa

Originally Posted by Buoy

Originally Posted by Midorikawa

Originally Posted by Buoy

Originally Posted by Human

I like the idea of medium games. Small should be not more than 10 people, medium should be not more than 18 and large can be 18+.

With that plan, small and medium overlap, so you can't exactly do it like that.

That would make small games up to 10, medium 11-18, and large 19+

Yes, but that isn't what Human said.

It was implied. In skype we discussed small games being up to 13, medium 14-18/19/20, and large games 19/20/21+

I don't see how it was implied. What he basically said was this:

Small games = ≤ 10
Medium games = ≤ 18
Large games = ≥ 19

Solutions for s ≤ x ≤ 10 are 1 -> 10 inclusive, and solutions for m ≤ x ≤ 18 are 1 -> 18. The first ten solutions for m ≤ x ≤ 10 are the same as s ≤ x ≤ 10, and so the two do overlap. It was neither implied nor said that s ≤ 10 < m ≤ 18 by Human, as s ≤ x ≤ 10 or m ≤ x ≤ 18 are clearly not the same as s ≤ 10 < m ≤ 18.

Just saying.

Been a while, eh? I might join another game sometime, but I'm going to be pretty busy....

Originally Posted by Buoy

Small games = ≤ 10
Medium games = ≤ 18
Large games = ≥ 19

Something can't be equal to more than or equal to something.

Small games are already capped at 13 (allows for 3 mafia, 9 town and 1 indep as standard), and honestly, not many games actually have less than that, so lowering the Small cap would just be counterproductive.

Originally Posted by KidBeano

Originally Posted by Buoy

Small games = ≤ 10
Medium games = ≤ 18
Large games = ≥ 19

Something can't be equal to more than or equal to something.

thanks, but i already knew that. it's immaterial, however, to the point i was conveying.

My mafia is up guys! Please join. <3

Pokemon DPPt - Sinnoh Mafia is a large scale game which I will need many players.

Maybe I should accept reservations? If anyone is interested, drop by my profile and leave me a VM.
I'll start advertising sometime later when people start showing interest XDD

Hello. I'm back.