Something came to my mind about how the Pokedex list Pokemon species in an AIM conversation...
I DO have to admit of some oddball species that don't match the Pokemon at all (Sandslash is a mouse?).[21:55] Eternallostgamer: wild monkey? There's a mankey in teh fight?
[21:56] Ida Kathry: No... the's Vigoroth's classification...
[21:56] Eternallostgamer: they're monkies?
[21:56] Eternallostgamer: thought they were... no clue
[21:56] Ida Kathry: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Vigoroth_%28Pok%C3%A9mon%29
[21:57] Ida Kathry: I'm just going by sources
[21:57] Eternallostgamer: (looks at sereebi instead)
[21:57] Eternallostgamer: hmm wild monkey
[21:57] Eternallostgamer: so wonder wjhat the slaking is
[21:58] Eternallostgamer: lazy... behomth
[21:58] Eternallostgamer: lazy... behemoth or something could'b fit more*
[21:59] Eternallostgamer: geez this is a weird one sloaoths are sloths in reality and sure I had no clue what Vigo was but Slack was a behmoth
[22:00] Eternallostgamer: none of those forms look like monkies. Game Freak IS on crack
Does anyone feel that some Pokemon species classifications are... inaccurate?