Pokemon? 3 years and older? Right... - Page 3

View Poll Results: What do you think?

Voters
48. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I fully agree, Pokémon shouldn't be E with this in it!

    4 8.33%
  • I slightly agree, it may contain these mature things, but it's still a child's game.

    19 39.58%
  • I disagree, these things don't matter, Pokémon is child friendly!

    23 47.92%
  • No opinion

    2 4.17%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 32 of 32
Like Tree43Likes

Thread: Pokemon? 3 years and older? Right...

  1. #31
    Registered User Floris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    120

    Default Re: Pokemon? 3 years and older? Right...

    New opinion food for you guys, contains spoilers though:


    My YouTube Vids (Pokémon White 2, Randomized Emerald and soon Platinum)

    -Why don't use Pokémon who you like instead of powerful ones? You'll have fun in every battle and winning gives more satisfaction!

  2. #32
    Brazilian Jolteon Spark Eletran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    46
    Follow Spark Eletran On Twitter Add Spark Eletran on Facebook
    Visit Spark Eletran's Youtube Channel

    Default Re: Pokemon? 3 years and older? Right...

    Quote Originally Posted by Floris View Post
    New opinion food for you guys, contains spoilers though:


    From videos I've seen, there seems to be even more about that. I dunno if the dialogue contradicts it or something, but from the cutscenes alone:



    I personally would prefer if this didn't bump up the rating, but still, I have to admit that these two things are a bit... darker than usual for Pokémon.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •