Or maybe it is becouse Pokemon only get one sprite in game and the Kangaskhan dont all actully have babies, especily not when they hatch.
Or maybe it is becouse Pokemon only get one sprite in game and the Kangaskhan dont all actully have babies, especily not when they hatch.
Diamond friend code: 4125 8769 6126
White friend code: 4513 3590 0644
White 2 friend code: 2065 8368 4111
There should be an NPC in one of the games that has bred a line of Kangaskhans not to have babies in them.
Baby Kangaskhan is a Kangaskhan, it dosent have to make sense. Alot of things in Pokemon dont make sense

The way I see it, the baby Kangaskhan is sort of part of the mother. Sort of like an underdeveloped version to take care of. A bit like Girafarig's tail, but separate from the body.
Kangaskhan is actually a multi-body pokemon, the best analogy being Cherubi.
Cherubi has that undeveloped Siamese twin head attached to it... Kangaskhan's "baby" is actually the same thing, where the small body is an undeveloped Siamese twin.
YET ANOTHER theory is that the "baby" is actually the male of the species, in the same vein as anglerfish. With anglerfish, the female has a large body (the thig that looks like Lanturn) but the male is actually just a tiny little guy that attaches himself to the female's body... The female sucks the body fluids out of him till he becomes like a puppet.
THAT could be what the baby is... And it would explain Kangaskhans breeding too...
I think about this too much...
When Game Freak first made Kanghaskan, they were on crack.
It's probably just Kangaskahn, but small because it's an infant. This may explain why some seemingly huge Pokemon hatch out of eggs that can fit into a backpack. Maybe their born tiny and then are raised (not in the Pokemon sense but in the real animal sense) to full fighting size, even though full fighting size may just be Level 1.
Last edited by Cerony; 12th March 2012 at 04:37 PM.

I think game freak just make something mysterious, then couldn't find an explanation for it later on for professors to discover and left it in mysteries, like kangaskhan's child, cubone's face, diglett's body, and the GS ball. In the anime, Ash just gave the GS ball to Oak for more researching, and then all was forgotten. Some say celebi was in the GS ball.
Captain Lincoln Stern, you stand here accused of...
12 counts of murder in the first degree
14 counts of armed theft of Federation property
22 counts of piracy in high space
18 counts of fraud
37 counts of rape
and 1 moving violation....how do you plead?

It is sort of part of the Kangaskan or a separate brain I guess, like Weezing's extra heads.

How is that possible when you can actually take the baby out of the bag?
Ok here's what I think Kangaskhan is Classified as the Parent Pokémon if it didn't have its Baby which is really another Kangaskhan at least a different forme it would lose its title as the Parent Pokémon and then it would become the Steroid using Kangaroo Pokémon (just kidding) sure other Pokémon raise there young but eventually the Pokémon grows and cares for itself as for Kangaskhan's young it stays as it is so there needs to be a caretaker since it is incapable of watching for itself so if you think about it they depend on each other in other words there symbiotic. I don't know what do you guys think about this theory.
Last edited by Snubbull Lover 777; 24th December 2012 at 03:13 AM.
Well, you have to remember that it goes way back to the first generation, back when Pokémon didn't have to make any sense at all, and where it couldn't relate to any other generations of Pokémon. All in all, Kangaskhan's baby was just put into the design to fit whatever idea they had with it back then. There are also those rumors about Cubone being the baby of Kangaskhan, where Kangaskhan was removed from the evolutionary line, though it's not something I like going into detail about.
Bookmarks