Thread: Does Charizard look male or female?

Female has longer eyelashes and lipstick. Dragons. Watch Shrek.

Normally I'd say male, since it's got that "look" going for it, but then again,

Originally Posted by Pyradox

Protect-the-nest, hell-hath-no-fury momly, but still looks like a mom.

That actually makes sense.

Hell, Kanghaskan looks like a male in my opinion, but it's 100% female. Guess it's all "in the eye of the beholder."

Still, looks pretty darn manly to me. So, male.

I don't see how you could mistake Kangaskhan as a male? I mean she has a pouch and baby for gods sake... oh yeah Gen VI fix Kanga sprite so it won't have a baby whe it hatches!

For me when I happened to think of Charizard, I was always automatically consider it as male.

Originally Posted by Articwolf10

I don't see how you could mistake Kangaskhan as a male? I mean she has a pouch and baby for gods sake...

Yeah, but when I (maybe and some peoples) first saw kangaskhan sprite, and haven't watch clearly that she have baby, I see her as a male. So, for me she have a male "look" on her.

It's a badass fire-breathing dragon. I'd say it looks more masculine.

Originally Posted by Raijuu

Female has longer eyelashes and lipstick. Dragons. Watch Shrek.

I've already watched it. Shrek is a comedy, and the dragon being female is played for laughs. Saying female dragons would have(if they existed) long eyelashes and lipstick is like saying a real female tiger has long eyelashes and lipstick.

Something is not automatically female if you put a ribbon and make-up on it, something is female because of their genitalia.

But you know that dragons doesnt exist, right?

Originally Posted by Raijuu

But you know that dragons doesnt exist, right?

You did not read my post, did you?

Originally Posted by CrazyAristocracy

Saying female dragons would have(if they existed) long eyelashes and lipstick is like saying a real female tiger has long eyelashes and lipstick.

if they existed= "They don't exist, obviously, but in the hypothetical case they did..."

Ok, dude. Im just kidding. Of course that lipstick does not make anything female. And you're right. I haven't read your post carefully. Sorry. I just said that Charizard looks female with something pink on it cause of Charla.

Sorry, too. I'm kind of stubborn.

I see most pokémon as gender-neutral. They are more similar to animals than they are to humans, and sexual dimorphism aside, a lot species look the same in the eyes of a human being.

Like a lot of people it seems I have always considered Charizard as a strong male figure, but this is mostly due to anime for me with Ash's Charizard.

Otherwise I see Charizard as a genderless beast lol ^^

...mostly gender-neutral, but I see all draconic beings as female. Especially Gyarados and Dragonite, but that's more on personal experience since every one of those I've had have been female since gender was introduced.