Heres my thoughts on 2 points from Takeshi's blogs (Entry 2 -)
Takeshi Shudo: ""There were people that felt that behind the words "It's just an accidence that I want to go there where Satoshi is" she hides a love interest for Satoshi, but it was just fake scene I prepared for Kasumi to make her sense of existence (in the series) stand out.
Kasumi doesn't have anything like love interest for Satoshi. If Kasumi's feeling of love towards Satoshi would become Pokemon's subject, it would break the whole structure of Pokemon."
Me:--This sounds crazy. Why would you make a fake scene in the first place? If its fake then it means nothing and in turn doesnt help "strengthen her sense of existence" at all anyway. Plus it still sounds like a pokeshipping moment regardless, so all it does is hurt his "pokeshipping doesnt exist" arguement.
More from the site: He explained why the scene where Kasumi rescued Satoshi that was sinking in the sea in Pokemon 2000 was erased in the end.
He wrote in the script that because Satoshi didn't breathe, she gave him artifical respiration, knocking his chest many times. He explained that he wanted him to live not because of the love she felt for him, but of her anger that her existence would become even weaker. He didn't want a misunderstanding abroad, so this part got deleted."
Me: This makes both him and Misty sound legit insane. Aside from the fact that this breaks "the fourth wall", why would you write a scene where a friend is concerned/angry about their existence on a show becoming weaker while their friend is dying?
I know I cant prove it, but i think that he just said that was the reason he would delete that scene because he knew that everyone (including other writers that supported pokeshipping) would see that scene as a pokeshipping moment and he just really didnt want that. Especially since he was contemplating taking her off the show anyway.