We know barely anything about the Fairy type, aside from it being super-effective against Dragons, two moves, and five Pokemon being introduced of the type, with only two of them being designed with Fairy in mind. Claiming it's poor game design is so silly and is similar to a child throwing his toys out of the pram.
We know enough. If Steel had been unveiled in Generation II and it was revealed that Pikachu
, and Alakazam
were Steel type, it would be more than enough to tell that a horrible game design mistake was being made. I do not appreciate the ad hominem - there is absolutely no reason to resort to personal attacks. I've given a detailed explanation for why this is a terrible mistake, which is being ignored by you in favour of comparing my displeasure with this execution of Fairy type to a child's tantrum.
It doesn't matter what's revealed next. The current five Pokemon we know have absolutely no common traits between them other than being cute, while simultaneously all having nothing to do with any kind of fairy (except, maybe, Furabebe). Pokemon's Fairy type is defined by nothing more than being cute. They might reveal Fairy Pokemon that are more closely associated with any type of fairy, but that doesn't change the fact that there are now Fairy Pokemon who have nothing to do with fairies and were made Fairy type on the sole basis that they are cute.