The whole dilemma about duos and quartets would be moot if there was simply a page about legendary groups in general instead.
The classification of legendary trio made sense when there was simply 2 trios and some other legends.
Now you have several trios and duos, some with an extra member, some without, some of the extra members being closer to the group, some being clearly superior...
Actually, even worse is the trio masters classification.
When half of those supposed trio masters are part of the trio itself, something isn't right.
Its inconsistent.
In one case, you have the rivals
Groudon and
Kyogre, with a clearly superior
Rayquaza, and they are considered a trio.
In another case you have three golems, and a fourth bigger one,
Regigigas, yet no one ever called them a quartet in human history.
Because these are 2 groups of legendaries,
-Weather legends, which consist of a duo and their master
-Golems, which consist of a trio and an extra member.
trios/duos->groups
master->extra member
Or do we have to wait till there is a group of 5 and they have an additional member that is inferior, for the term master to look too specialized and be replaced by something more general.
User:Saiph charon - Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia
Bookmarks