Quantcast
Back from Vacations (or rather, Infractions) - Blogs - Bulbagarden Forums

View RSS Feed

OMG, I killed Bulbagarden!

Back from Vacations (or rather, Infractions)

Rate this Entry
27 Comments
by
Maxim Posthumus
, 20th November 2009 at 07:53 AM (994 Views)
Most of you probably noticed that I was gone from the forums for two weeks and my nick was crossed out, meaning that I was banned. But I don't care... I got deserved vacations from Bulbagarden. But now I'm back.

Do you want to know why I was banned? That's right. Because of Kotone. Now I totally have a reason to hate her. But I wonder how it's possible that I wasn't punished for my signature for so long. Many people, including admins, have seen it numerous times. And suddenly I get banned for that. I guess that Bulbagarden isn't a thing that has its logic.

However, the infraction for the signature was just a final kick to already-lying me. The punch that decided on my ban earlier was practically undeserved. I got 4 infraction points for saying to an other user that he "doesn't know anything". Evkl interpreted that as an implication that the other user was mentally disabled. I mean, WHAT THE HELL?! Were those words really so hard to understand? Are you ALWAYS taking everything so literally, Americans? It's really stupid. Not to mention that the other user didn't feel offended or anything. The reaction of the other user should be the measure of the post abusiveness, NOT admin's subjective interpretation. Not to mention that I WASN'T flamewarring with that user.

So, I'm living with 21 infraction points. It's over the ban limit but somehow I'm breathing. However, I think that it's at least "not needed".

As thou rememberst correctly, I got [b]15 permanent infraction points[/b] for one post. It's COMPLETELY against the Infraction System (which wasn't all that different from today's one back then). I mean, 10 points and another 5 from a different admin, just because of one post. Not to mention that it wasn't anything objective. It was all about opinions. Some may agree with them, some may not. I think that 5 points was all I deserved for that. Because indeed, that was a flamewar.

I'm not, by any means, asking for total amnesty. But believe me, I'VE ATONED FOR THAT POST LONG AGO ALREADY. I'm not taking such active part in "unsafe" debates anymore, and really watching my word. Giving me 15 permanent points for ONE POST wasn't right at the first place. But I've sucked it up and tried to be a better user. After a long time of a safe policy of posting, after getting banned twice (one ban was an admitted fail, the other one was an unadmitted one), I realized that I'm unfairly and severely restrained. With my current situation (21 infraction points), even a single use of profanity is almost LETHAL for me. Just because I was dishonourably stabbed in back by an alliance of two woman one year ago. But as I said, I'm not asking for a full amnesty. Out of those 15 permanent infraction points, take out at least 5, not neccessarily out of them. I've atoned. I deserve a second chance. [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pp0ce1kS-yw"]I'M BEGGING THOU FOR MERCY![/URL]

Submit "Back from Vacations (or rather, Infractions)" to Digg Submit "Back from Vacations (or rather, Infractions)" to del.icio.us Submit "Back from Vacations (or rather, Infractions)" to StumbleUpon Submit "Back from Vacations (or rather, Infractions)" to Google

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
  1. Force Fire's Avatar
    Maybe because we all just hate you?
  2. Maxim Posthumus's Avatar
    [QUOTE=Charitard;bt32040]Maybe because we all just hate you?[/QUOTE]

    Speak for yourself.

    Also, it's not any reason, do you realize? The infraction system is supposed to be same for everyone. Fodness or hatred towards particular users doesn't have anything to do with it.
  3. Zynetic's Avatar
    To be honest, no matter where you go, you're going to find people who just HATE you and will do anything in their power to try to and do something bad to you.
  4. Pidgeot's Avatar
    [QUOTE=Charitard;bt32040]Maybe because we all just hate you?[/QUOTE]

    Chariturd, that's really mean. Everybody might hate you, but we don't go blurting it out.
  5. Dewgong Reign's Avatar
    What was your signature?

    Quote Originally Posted by DuskDawn97
    Charitard, that's really mean. Everybody might hate you, but we don't go blurting it out.
    Amusng typo fix'd.
  6. Pidgeot's Avatar
    o_O I meant that typo to happen. Sorry in advance to Chariturd (Sorry!). Green apologises too. >>>
  7. evkl's Avatar
    I think you'll find that we aren't deaf to complaints.
  8. Maxim Posthumus's Avatar
    Thanks!

    You've made me believe in Bulbagarden again.

    Thanks a million! I'm really satisfied.
  9. DRWS!'s Avatar
    Linking to that song deserves at least another infraction imo.
  10. Maxim Posthumus's Avatar
    [QUOTE=.Don'tRunWithScizor.;bt32058][size=1]Linking to that song deserves at least another infraction imo.[/size][/QUOTE]

    Well, it was a bit trollish of me. But it worked at least. It was also the best one that I could think at the moment.
    Updated 20th November 2009 at 02:21 PM by Maxim Posthumus
  11. Nekusagi's Avatar
    No.
  12. 1337R34P3R's Avatar
    i must admit, the blogs haven't been quite as interesting without you around. welcome back.
  13. Nando's Avatar
    SHE IS NOT CRYS
  14. 1337R34P3R's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Marcus_Chiaki
    SHE IS NOT CRYS
    well, that didn't take long.
  15. Blackjack Gabbiani's Avatar
    Well, if you recall, here's the post that netted you five of those perminant infraction points. And I stand by my decision.
  16. Maxim Posthumus's Avatar
    [QUOTE=Blackjack Palazzo;bt32091]Well, if you recall, [url=http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showpost.php?p=595973&postcount=24]here's the post[/url] that netted you five of those perminant infraction points. And I stand by my decision.[/QUOTE]

    That post was filled with opinions. Disagree with them? Okay. But giving an user 5 permanent points isn't a good way to tell him that he's wrong.

    But anyway, I don't see what was THAT wrong about that post. Opinions. They're subjective. The only risky thing in that was "Damn you, homo-cult". But still, it's not something that deserves five PERMANENT infraction points. Five normal points, probably. But not permanent ones.

    What you did was against the infraction system. Add Ketsuban's 10 points to that.

    I met with fairness after one whole motherfuckin' year and three months. It's really enough time for atoning.

    So, swallow your pride and bear with the fact that I'm uninfracted. I lived with your infraction points with one and 1/4 years. That's really enough.
  17. H-con's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackjack Palazzo
    Well, if you recall, here's the post that netted you five of those perminant infraction points. And I stand by my decision.
    After reading that post, I must say I agree with giving those points.

    And besides, it wasn't only "Damn you homo-cult" in that post that was wrong.
  18. Maxim Posthumus's Avatar
    [QUOTE=H-con;bt32107]After reading that post, I must say I agree with giving those points.

    And besides, it wasn't [i]only[/i] "Damn you homo-cult" in that post that was wrong.[/QUOTE]

    Of course. Because not being a homosexual supporter is wrong on these forums.

    I've atoned and that's what matters. If those points weren't permanent, everything would be okay. But they were, which was completely against the infraction system.

    Now giving me those points back would be just too much. Just give me the motherfuckass second chance, instead of desperately trying to prove that you were right back then (talking to Blackjack here). The infractions have been reversed. That's a fact.
  19. mariowie's Avatar
    title of this blog should have been "they see me trollin they'r hatin, because i am gay hatin"
    i you got then banned then, they just hate you
  20. H-con's Avatar
    I especially liked when you said that you didn't approve of a scientific study when it came from Sweden. That really showed your ignorance. Last time I visited Sweden, I couldn't see any sign of this "brain-washing" you mentioned, and I would know that, as I've visited Sweden several times. It shows how little actual knowledge you have. And besides, shouldn't a scientist be independent of the society's opinion when executing a study.

    It's not your opinion that really annoyed me, it was that you said you were the guardian of moral and all that shit. It has "always" been wrong due to the definition of that "moral", which has it roots very long ago. The definition of moral can change.

    The point is that you've given no really evidence that being gay is a bad thing except your definition of moral and blankly disregarded a scientific study that proves otherwise due to the scientists were Swedes in addition to saying you're the guardian of moral and calling the gay-supporters a cult. Anything I've missed now?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast