Originally Posted by Wyvernphlare I don't know I thought they were reducing the roster and if they put in all these guys we won't get Metal General Q-Q Sakurai was misquoted as saying they would reduce the roster when he actually said that there probably wouldn't be as many new characters as there were in Brawl.
I don't know I thought they were reducing the roster and if they put in all these guys we won't get Metal General Q-Q
You should really go back to Rusty Shackleford. OH, or change your username to Rusty Shacklefairy!
Bro Bro Erratic type ability or trait. Bro ERRATIC MOTHER TYPE.
Well, this feels awkward.
Wouldn't it be Tendou Soujiro nee Quattro Bajeena nee Rusty Shackleford? (nee Hurricane Polimar)
I actually hope it's the Love-type now, as much as I really hate that idea, just so you're wrong. :P
Go to my blot and read the post I made about this crap. Don't feel like linking it.
Hope you're right ;D
Fairy type would be my favorite new thing in Pokemon since I've started playing.
(Granted, I wasn't really around when Dark and Steel were introduced)
Actually, MageLeif posted about the Fairy type on February 11th.
I'm going to feel underwhelmed if Fairy is the only new type. I would have been content with just one type had they announced it months ago, but by now the element of surprise has been almost completely negated.
I don't see how they would be able to work in choosing a specific Eeveelution. Cycling through 8 evolutions would be a lot harder than the three you had with Pokemon Trainer, and it's not like you could do different button combinations for different evolutions. It's also a lot harder I feel doing things that aren't bipedal. Ivysaur could work because of vine whip, so I could only see them do that with Sylveon's ribbons. My best bet would be them bringing Mewtwo back and having it be able to forme change à la Zelda.
They definitely wouldn't do Zoroark. That ship has sailed. The thing pretty much lost all relevance once BW came out. It didn't have a whole lot to do in that game. Brawl just happened to coincide well enough with Brawl's release for Lucario to still be relevant at that point.
I think it'll be Zoroark, Genesect, or Mewtwo. I love Eevee, but I don't see it making the cute due to them walking on all four's all the time and I'm not sure what Eevee would do? Dig, Shadow Ball, Last Resort and maybe evolution. The idea between shifting from different forms sounds cool and makes me think of PokeSpe automatically. I'd love it but it's wishful thinking.
Those were fun times in 4chan. Seeing everything overreact to Boobaboom and Houndoomed.
But the electric dark planet pokémon sure was cool
Tendou Soujirou for gen VI prophet if Fairy type comes true (which I strongly believe).
Xbox One (Horrid name. Why name your 3rd console after what people associate with the first?) will sell very well in the US, like the 360 did. Their audience is the family room and they will get that audience. The 360 is now used more for general entertainment purposes than actual gaming and MS is capitalizing on that by pushing their next console as a super TiVo.
WiiU (Equally horrid name. The name suggests it is an add on to the Wii, which I'm sure some people think it is) will sell well across the world (probably worse than the Xbox One in the west given the subpar sales it has gotten so far)
but it will forever be known, like it's predecessor, as that console one only buys for great Nintendo exclusives and the occasional 3rd party gem.
PS4 (Good name! Don't change it.) will sell extremely well in Japan, again, like it's predecessor. I have no idea if it will stand up well against the Xbox One outside of Japan, though. Still, even just Japan is a strong foothold for gaming.
@Fab; One's success is much less certain than you think. Ever since the rumors have surfaced of things like always online and anti used, gamers have almost universally expressed their dissatisfaction with the idea. And none of the console's strong points really make up for it. One is likely not going to be profitable except to the most diehard of Microsoft fans. Between Wii U and One, Wii U will likely be a much more attractive option because it will have a greater variety of games and isn't doing all of this bullshit. PS4 is still going to smoke them both, though.
@stickerstaryoshi; They're not holding a traditional conference. They'll still be showing off new games at E3, you just need to watch Nintendo Direct to see them.
Hopefully E3 makes my Wii U worth it.
I thought Nintendo wouldn't be at E3?
@Bolt the Cat; Surely you would be surprised if such a big name as Xbox is suddenly decided "yeah, nah we cannae be arsed wi this anymare." Microsoft aren't going to drop out of the arms race because the number thing a business lives for is to be profitable. And One is going to be a success.
I can't help but feel that people that say the Wii U is a better buy is reflecting buyers remorse onto others for their console choice. I don't think it is, the games and software do not interest, my horse is the PS4.
Xbox One less console for me to buy.
Seriously, though, the presentation was bad, and not only does it have no advantage over the PS4, but it has several disadvantages, requiring Kinect and having to connect to the Internet at least once every 24 hours. I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft drops out of the console race at this point, even the Wii U is a better buy.
Title was a little misleading.
am more of a super sentai guy myself